|
以下表格忽略了球员状态和受伤机会等因素,仅用于了解情况和横向比较
门将
名次 俱乐部 首发rating 替补质量
1st chelsea 78.56 8
2nd real madrid 73.27 4
3rd man utd 72.82 7
4th liverpool 72.47 7
5th arsenal 71.89 6
6th valencia 70.86 4
7th inter 69.03 7
8th milan 69.01 4
9th barcelona 68.66 6
10th roma 67.12 6
后卫
名次 俱乐部 首发rating(ave) 替补质量
1st barcelona 73.92 5
2nd man utd 73.19 5
3rd chelsea 72.82 4
4th real madrid 72.73 6
5th inter 72.65 5
6th milan 71.93 4
7th valencia 71.88 4
8th arsenal 71.18 5
9th liverpool 70.89 6
10th roma 68.55 3
中场
名次 俱乐部 首发rating(ave) 替补质量
1st barcelona 75.68 7
2nd chelsea 75.45 6
3rd milan 74.41 4
4th inter 73,91 6
5th real madrid 73.14 4
6th valencia 72.66 3
7th arsenal 72.57 6
8th roma 71.10 7
9th liverpool 70.81 5
10th man utd 69.65 4
射手
名次 俱乐部 首发rating(ave) 替补质量
1st arsenal 74.82 6
2nd inter 74.80 9
3rd barcelona 74.39 6
4th real madrid 73.97 9
5th valencia 73.04 4
6th chelsea 72.09 2
7th milan 71.78 5
8th roma 71.00 5
9th man utd 70.57 5
10th liverpool 69.53 5
球队后备实力
名次 俱乐部 板凳深度 球队价值 开档转会费
1st barcelona 26 487,000,000 3,440,000
2nd arsenal 23 286,000,000 20,000,000
3rd real madrid 22 362,000,000 6,890,000
3rd inter 22 210,000,000 15,170,000
5th man utd 20 308,000,000 16,900,000
5th valencia 20 178,000,000 690,000
5th liverpool 20 149,000,000 7,980,000
8th chelsea 18 295,000,000 66,470,000
9th milan 16 140,000,000 10,640,000
10th roma 13 203,000,000 2,070,000
*替补质量说明在该位置上以现有阵容小规模轮换的可能性;而替补“板凳深度”综合了球队具有顶级联赛水平的替补球员的数量和质量两个维度,这两项数值由简单数学模型推算近似得到,仅有横向比较的意义
[ 本帖最后由 dickbird 于 2006-10-7 07:38 PM 编辑 ] |
|