UEFA刚宣布昨晚荷兰的争议球不越位
欧足联宣布在伯尔尼举行的荷兰-意大利的比赛中Ruud van Nistelrooy的进球有效，并解释主裁判Peter Fröjdfeldt是正确的。欧足联秘书长David Taylor针对公众对Van Nistelrooy处在越位位置上打进1球作出了回应，他说公众的理解和规则有点出入是有情可原的因为当时的情况并不多见。但Van Nistelrooy并没有越位，因为在意大利守门员前面还有另一名意大利球员！
uefa.com 有没有详细点解释当时的情况呢? Van Nistelrooy looked yards offside when he prodded home from close range. But it appears he was played onside by defender Christian Panucci, who was lying off the pitch at the time. Christian Panucci went off through contact with his own goalkeeper (Gianluigi) Buffon, thus he was still considered part of the game.
Quoting article 11.4.1. of the refereeing code that states "an opposing player cannot be offside when one of the last two defenders has left the field of play" - as in the case of Panucci.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=ePiCU71OrT4
[ 本帖最后由 Biomedicine 于 2008-6-10 11:54 AM 编辑 ] 原帖由 Biomedicine 于 2008-6-10 07:52 PM 发表 http://fmfans.cpgl.net/images/common/back.gif
Van Nistelrooy looked yards offside when he prodded home from close range. But it appears he was played onside by defender Christian Panucci, who was lying off the pitch at the time. Christian Pa ...
清楚明白...长知识了 其实后来听说意大利的不满不是越位,而是球员受伤倒地的时候,荷兰没有死球 原帖由 czyubiwen 于 2008-6-10 12:08 PM 发表 http://fmfans.cpgl.net/images/common/back.gif
其实后来听说意大利的不满不是越位,而是球员受伤倒地的时候,荷兰没有死球
Panucci was in contact with Buffon, not Dutch players 长见识了。。。 看过5月好像26那期天下足球关于欧冠争议判罚的
陆俊说过防守球员在底线外也算防守方球员，不管是否无意，故意出去会给牌的，进攻方则不算。他说那次阿森纳那场裁判误判越位。 这些都是官方的东西~很明显不希望裁判出问题 确实不越位，依旧顶意大利
下场必定虎起
页:
[1]
2