求坛子兄弟救命，翻译的来热下身
[内容摘要]：虚拟财产的法律保护机制是目前法律界的一个热门话题。电子游戏产业作为一个新兴的产业，正在以惊人的速度向前发展，但与此相伴的是有关虚拟财产大量纠纷的出现。由于立法的滞后，这些纠纷往往不能够得到很好地解决。这一问题已经严重阻碍了我国电子游戏产业的发展，因此我们必须加快相应的立法。本文在说明虚拟财产概念和基本法律特征的基础上，着重对虚拟财产的法律性质及法律属性进行阐述；通过分析现有的关于虚拟财产属性的三种不同观点，提出虚拟财产权是一种债权。最后进一步分析了虚拟财产主体的法律关系，提出了一些处理实际问题看法。
论文要定稿了，本人实在英语太差了，求坛子兄弟帮忙。 晕，我的英语水平有限，只能帮你顶，嘿嘿0=0150=0150=0240=0240=0420=042 找那个在英国留学的台湾同胞帮忙 Virtual property protected by law is a new discussion in the lawyer circle. Computer games are a new high technology industry, it’s been growing very fast, and the virtual property comes out with the game fast. But law always being out dated can't reach the speed of the game making, and a lot of the problems of virtual property can't solve out properly. This kind of problems are been slowing our nation’s high technology games growth, we have to set the new laws as soon as possible
This article is about the basic law rules of the virtual property, to expound on describing the goal the how the laws are been set. There r three points; virtual property is a creditor's right. Last we have been analyze the set laws of the main body of the virtual property, and asked point of views on practical question. Abstract: The legitimate protection mechanism of virtual property is a hot issue in the circle of law. The industry of electronic game is gathering its development at a dramatic speed, with a great deal of disputes on virtual properties also emerging simultaneously. Due to the delay of established laws concerned, those distributes can not be settled at the moment, which has done great harm to the development of the industry of electronic game, so that we must speed up in promulgating laws in this regard.
Based on the explanation of the concept and the basic characteristics of virtual properties, this paper intends to focus on the illustration of the legal nature and legal essence of virtual properties and makes it clear that the right of virtual properties is a kind of credit right. Analyses of the legal relationship among the subjects of virtual properties will also be made so as to shed some light on the treatment of practical problems.
4w的版本 To protect the virtual property by law is a popular topic in the law circle in nowadays. As
a new high technology industry, computer game has been developing at a surprising speed. At
the same time, a lot of problems about virtual property come out. But the laws' building
cannot catch up with the speed of the game making, these problems cannot be solved properly.
As this question has prevented from the development of computer game industry in our
country, we must set up the new law as soon as possible.
In this article, author tried to explain the conception of virtual property and basic legal
characters, especially put emphasis on the describtion of virtual property's legal nature
and legal attribute. By analyzing the three different opinions about virtual property's
legal nature, the author set the virtual property right as creditor's right. Finally, the
author analyzed the legal nexus in the main body of the virtual property, and gave his own
points in dealing with practical problems.
weeksand的版本 太专业了点吧。。。 Sorry I dont understand exactly what is your thesis about so can only give a very poorly translated version. Please clarify relevant points if you want to build on this.
The protection of virtual property rights (VPR) by legal means is under hot debates among legislative authority. As a promising emerging market, the development of electronic gaming industry advances in a dramatic speed, which is unfortunately accompanied by an enormous amount of dispute over VPR. These disputes are however not easily resolved with satisfaction under the current legal system. While this problem severely hurdles the development of electronic gaming industry in China, it is necessary to facilitate relevant legislations over this issue.
Based on the understanding of VPR and the features of current legal structure, the present paper will focus on illustrating the nature and characteristics of VPR from the legal aspects. Through an analysis on the major contemporary opinions regarding the nature of VPR, the author proposed that VPR should be treated as the creditor’s right. Finally the author investigated the relationship between VPR and relevant legislations and gave his own opinions in dealing with practical situations. 俺那时候也是用软件翻译然后找人修改的 LZ 都有了4W的版本了 还要别人的干什么
页:
[1]
2